Per the order - item # 7 ... Is he is in violation if he makes a public statement that totally misrepresents the findings and conclusions of law as stated in the ACC complaint?
OK, knowing that ....... HERE is a translated excerpt from page 10 of the document he shared as the legal filing of the lawsuit against Nick, et al, that discusses the ACC actions ....... The excerpt begins with "Es el caso que" and ending with the underlined "el dinero de mis inversionistas."
" It is the case that because little progress was made on the ESMERALDA project, I was required by THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE COMMISSION OF CORPORATIONS OF ARIZONA, to clarify the state of the investments since according to their investigations a fraud could be brewing against my clients due to the lack of progress of the project; This investigation finally concluded without sanctions, because although ESMERALDA was stalled by the bad administration and the fraudulent actions carried out by NICOLAS NAJERA ANTUNEZ, I never stopped complying with the interests and commissions that I committed to my investors, in addition to the fact that Arizona authorities had reviewed the feasibility of both projects through a market study and evaluation, and also analyzed my intentions and determined that the project was feasible in order to pay investors their invested capital and also determined that my intentions were honest. In order to ensure that investors were paid for their investment, we therefore signed a settlement agreement that reaffirmed that Daniel Butterfield and his project would reimburse investors by developing and selling condominiums as originally planned. Consequently, I acquired the commitment and obligation for investors to obtain interest, which will be paid in full together with the capital once the condominiums are developed and sold. All of this was agreed to by the Commission of the Arizona Corporation and by Daniel Butterfield and officially signed on May 27 (twenty-seven) 2018 (two thousand eighteen), which means that I need to carry out the project because it is in between the money and my investors." [Note- the error in the year]
Is that the way any of you recall the ACC legal complaint and, with his consent, the resulting Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law? Not me. No way, no how.
This goes to Paul Kitchen on Monday. We will see what THEY think of this.
It would be to all investors advantage to take an interest in how things are playing out.
The information that DB continues to transmit is ...well, like he is writing a novel and needs to use lots of adjectives and adverbs to “ add color” to his story so the reader will continue to turn the pages.
I think this whole sorted mess mightmake for an interesting movie.
It has all the essential parts except for the ending. We need to cast the characters andget a script.
Might be the only way anyone will ever get any money.
Are you sending all of the SMS rants and claims to Mr. Kitchen? Is he with the ACC? What could they do to db if they agree there's proof he has violated the decree?